WiredWX Christian Hobby Weather Tools
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

WiredWX Christian Hobby Weather ToolsLog in

 


descriptionTop security suites fail exploit tests EmptyTop security suites fail exploit tests

more_horiz
12 suites get 'F'; Only Symantec's detects more than 3% of real attacks

(Computerworld) Security software suites don't protect users from real-world exploits, a bug-tracking company charged today after launching 300 test attacks against a dozen programs, including popular software from McAfee Inc., Symantec Corp. and Trend Micro Inc.

"The Internet security suites are marketing themselves as the one solution users need to be safe online," said Thomas Kristensen, chief technology officer at Secunia Inc., which ran the tests. "In our opinion, that's just not true."

Secunia sicced hundreds of vulnerability exploits -- some proof-of-concept code that triggered a vulnerability, others that included payloads -- on 12 suites, including Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2009, Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Live OneCare, AVG Technologies' Internet Security 8.0 and McAfee's Internet Security Suite 2009. The attack code was delivered by files of various formats, including Office documents and malformed images, and by malicious Web sites that triggered browser and ActiveX bugs. The target was a Windows XP SP2 machine missing "certain patches and with a number of vulnerable programs," according to Secunia.

While Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2009 took top honors, it detected only 64 out of 300 exploits, or just 21% of the total. Even so, that beat most rivals by substantial margins. Trend Micro's Internet Security 2008, for example, detected only 2.3% of the exploits, while McAfee's Internet Security Suite 2009 identified 2% and Microsoft's OneCare spotted just 1.8% of the exploits.


More: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9117042&source=NLT_VVR&nlid=37

............................................................................................

Please be a GeekPolice fan on Facebook!

Top security suites fail exploit tests Lambo-11

Have we helped you? Help us! | Doctor by day, ninja by night.

descriptionTop security suites fail exploit tests EmptyRe: Top security suites fail exploit tests

more_horiz
Ok, see that is where they are VERY mastaken.

An anti-malware suite is NOT designed to detect and stop exploites that are being executed, they are designed to detect and stop malishous software that they currently know about.

If they wanted to test programs that should be able to detect exploites, then they should have tested Threat Fire, CAM, ect... Those are actually designed to detect and stop exploites. The fact that an anti-malware suite stops an exploite at all is a miracle in itself.

descriptionTop security suites fail exploit tests EmptyRe: Top security suites fail exploit tests

more_horiz
Norton is actually much better than I expected.

............................................................................................

Top security suites fail exploit tests Segmen10

FunSubstance is the place to go for daily entertainment.

descriptionTop security suites fail exploit tests EmptyRe: Top security suites fail exploit tests

more_horiz
privacy_tip Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum